Connect with us

Featured

Does Black Lives Matter Call for Censorship?

Published

on

Black lives matter written on Heart

Is There Ever a Time for Censorship?

Whilst coronavirus continues to dictate our daily lives, protestors line the streets of Britain, as well as the UK to protest for Black Lives Matter and against the protests that are tearing down statues across the UK.

Protests broke out against the protests that removed the statues throughout London. These protests are the aftermath in light of what happened to George Floyd.

George Floyd died on the 25th May at the hands of police brutality in Minneapolis, USA.

There have been widespread protests across both the United States and the UK.

The death of Floyd has pulled the trigger on racism within both countries, and incited a new conversation between the black and non-black communities.

People are speaking out about their experience of racism. This is not just the black community, but the whole BAME (Black, Asian, Minority, Ethnic) community. 

This is opening up a conversation that has long been needed, of people’s relationship to those of another race.

Censorship within the Entertainment Industry

The irony is, whilst the black community speak up, the non-ethnic community is facing censorship. Chris Lilley, the creator of ‘Summer Heights High’ has been censored from Australian Netflix.

It is a difficult conversation to broach when the subject involves stereotyping and entertainment. This is especially true when it concerns comedy. Lilley manages to create his depiction of Australian life within a high school, imitating the characters he deems to portray it.

Chris Lilley has three main characters in Summer Heights High: Jai’me (public school girl), Mr. G (narcissistic school teacher) and Jona from Tonga. Chris Lilley plays all three characters.

The series has been cancelled due to Lilley’s depiction of ‘Jona from Tonga’.

It is of no doubt that ‘Summer Heights High’ is inappropriate for different reasons, but it does not stop it from being funny. It is funny, because those who push boundaries-do tend to be funny. It does not necessarily have anything to do with race either, as stereotypes are being made fun of-across every race.

It is funny because someone is daring to talk about them.

There is also an argument for the pushing of boundaries, for if we did not have that; there would be no reform.

One of Lilley’s characters, Jai’me (public school girl) challenges the notion of white privilege. She is the main character, alongside narcissistic Mr. G.

What is happening within the streets of Britain at present, is essentially ‘a pushing of boundaries’.

I think the conversation needs to centre around ‘what’ racism is. 

What does it actually mean to be racist?

There seems to be a real disparity in this. Children nowadays are growing up, and being taught that any kind of ‘indifference’ is racism. They are therefore calling out anything to be racist, which has implications of its own.

Children are most likely being taught by adults on racism, who do not understand racism. And so they are instead taught ignorance.

The majority of stereotyping within the series is aimed at the ‘white’ stereotypes within the series. However, the unsurprising connotations of including such a character as Jona, has inevitably been questioned. 

This is understandable, yet, what about the other two characters within the series? Is Lilley being racist to white people by depicting two white stereotypes?

Again, the discussion on what ‘racism’ actually is, needs to happen.

Is it right to have censored such a show?

I love ‘Summer Heights High’. It makes me laugh, out loud, and I appreciate it for what it is. If we censor all stereotypes that happen to have a different colour of skin, I think the point is being missed. 

Life is funny because of our differences.

There is an argument that if BAME stereotypes were to be removed in its’ entirety from all corners, would it only be acceptable to make fun of white people?

Does this end racism?

Or does it create it?

Removing BAME members from comedy, suggests they are no longer part of the community.

It also may reinstate that there is a problem time and time again, because it is being avoided, rather than being dealt with.

There is racism within Britain, and there is a conversation that needs to happen within all institutions. 

Is it right to censor reporting of the removal of statues?

Certainly not. It is what is happening right now within our culture, and it needs to be discussed, as it is.

Is it right to censor the lives of the men who partook in the slave trade?

It is in no doubt how emotive a statue of a slave trader must be. The people who tore those statues down, tore down the institutional racism, which is at the heart of the inequality within the United States, but sadly also the United Kingdom.

I understand from a humble perspective, what it must be like to face racism of which, most goes unnoticed, because it is carried within the sub-conscious minds of us all.

Jamelia, the black British singer, was on BBC Breakfast recently. She tells the story of being  pulled over by the police, whilst in her car, for no other reason than the ‘make’ of it, she claims. This is a weekly occurrence. 

There are also statues within London of figures who led the act to abolish slavery, William Wilberforce was one of the main politicians who did so, with the eventual abolition of slavery in 1833.

Yet, this did not stop ‘No Blacks, No Irish, No Dogs’, a written statement within Britain, being spouted in every nook and cranny imaginable, from flat lets to pub windows; and this was only in the 1960’s.

There have been callings for reform regarding these statues. It is suggested the statues remain, but plaques are instead used to describe who these people are, and both sides of the story.

I think this is what is important. I think there is only ever small cause for censorship. This is a time that needs every story to come to light. If both sides of the story are conveyed, with the slave traders who have sat so prominently for so long, in the streets of Britain, then there is a chance to understand and learn from it.

If these stories are removed, then it will just be buried, but it will not disappear.

Is it Right to Censor Little Britain?

On the 5th of June, ‘Little Britain’, the British sketch comedy was taken off Netflix, deemed not responsible in the aftermath of George Floyd.

Within the show, both creators depict BAME characters, as well as white characters.

If Little Britain retold the story, without any BAME characters, the white stereotypes would be the only ones left.

Is this right? It could no longer be called Little Britain.

Where it is completely understandable that this might be offensive to some people, the same could be said for the white counterparts.

Stereotypes are a fact of human nature, behavioural patterns which can be good or bad, they are simply how humans relate to each other.

Is it not human nature to laugh at each other?

If this is censored, what do we have left?

If Little Britain negatively affects the way an individual sees another, in relation to the colour of their skin; then it is right it was removed.

However, I think most people are able to rise above stereotypes, and see them just as that.

Does the insinuation of another race and their stereotypes, affect the way Matt Lucas and David Walliams interact with these very communities?

I think this is the real indicator of whether someone is racist or not.

The problem lies with the lack of BAME representatives throughout the broadcasting world. Stereotyping of white communities does not affect white relations within the general population, because there is the disparity in other representations.

When there are so few positive BAME representatives, what do people have to compare to?

In light of this matter, I think it was right to censor Little Britain for the moment, it is too sensitive a time, and changes need to be made, before the subject can be broached constructively.

This is the heart of the conversation that needs to happen.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Featured

Militias, Fragmentation, and Escalation Across Palestinian Territories

Published

on

Militias-Fragmentation-and-Escalation-Across-Palestinian-Territories

When Israel and the United States launched a full-scale military assault against Iran, international attention shifted instantly toward the possibility of a wider Middle Eastern War. The blockage of the Strait of Hormuz, the reluctance of the US and Israel to completely obliterate Iran and wipe out their leadership, are not just threats to the Middle East but to the entire world.

Currently, headlines are focusing on missiles, regional alliances, and the risk of escalation between powerful adversaries. On the other hand, the situation across the Palestinian territories did not pause. Instead, a series of heinous developments inside Gaza and the occupied West Bank reveal that the genocide is entering a new and increasingly complex phase.

Some of the recent trends reshaping the reality across Palestinian territories include the rise of militias, fragmentation inside the Gaza Strip, and intensified violence across the West Bank.

Together, these developments suggest that the genocide is evolving into a more layered and unpredictable struggle.

The Emergence of Israeli-Backed Militias in Gaza

One of the most striking developments in recent weeks is the rise of armed Palestinian factions operating inside Gaza with apparent coordination with Israeli forces.

In this context, several groups have begun carrying out operations targeting Hamas members and infrastructure within areas of Gaza under Israeli military control.

Among the groups identified are organizations known as the Popular Army, including Northern Forces and the Free Homeland Forces, which are believed to be connected to a broader network sometimes referred to as the Popular Forces.

Moreover, these militias have carried out activities in Gaza, including:

  • Raids on different locations
  • Abductions of civilians
  • Intelligence gathering operations for Israel

Their presence introduces a new dimension to the conflict. For years, the main dynamic inside Gaza has centered on the confrontation between Israeli forces and Hamas. The appearance of armed Palestinian factions aligned against Hamas complicates that structure and adds the possibility of internal fragmentation.

Security analysts warn that such developments can significantly reshape power dynamics within genocidal zones, bringing further instability and chaos.

Fragmentation of Governance Inside Gaza

The prolonged genocide and the destruction of infrastructure across the enclave have weakened administrative structures and complicated governance.

Several factors now contribute to the fragmentation of authority:

  • The continued presence of Israeli military operations in Gaza
  • The emergence of new armed factions operating independently
  • The erosion of centralized administrative control due to the scale of genocide

The introduction of additional militias may further complicate efforts to establish political stability in the territory. In many genocidal zones, the proliferation of armed groups often leads to competing spheres of influence and weakened governance structures.

Ultimately, this fragmentation could make future political settlements even more difficult, as multiple actors compete for influence within the territory.

Escalation in the West Bank

The West Bank is not immune to the genocidal activities of Israel. While Gaza and Iran remain at the center of international attention, the occupied West Bank has also experienced a dramatic increase in violence since the Gaza genocide began.

According to figures cited by Palestinian authorities and international observers, more than 1,000 Palestinians have been killed in the West Bank since the beginning of the Gaza genocide.

The violence has taken several forms, such as Israeli military raids in Palestinian towns and refugee camps, armed confrontations between Palestinian militants and Israeli forces, and attacks by Israeli settlers on Palestinian communities.

In recent months, numerous Palestinian villages have reported raids in which homes were damaged, vehicles burned, and farmland destroyed. Some incidents have also led to the displacement of families from rural areas.

Settler Violence and Community Displacement

Settler violence has become one of the most significant sources of instability in the West Bank.

There is a growing number of incidents involving attacks on Palestinian property and agricultural land.

These incidents include:

  • Destruction of olive groves and crops
  • Arson attacks targeting homes and vehicles
  • Confrontations between settlers and residents

The consequences extend beyond the immediate damage. In some cases, Palestinian families have left villages after repeated attacks, contributing to gradual displacement in certain rural areas.

Gaza in the Context of a Wider Regional Conflict

The US, Israel–Iran confrontation has transformed the regional geopolitical landscape dramatically. Military tensions between these countries have raised fears of a broader Middle Eastern war involving multiple actors.

However, the conflict within Palestinian territories continues to evolve largely independent of the regional headlines. The recent closure of the Rafah border has triggered panic buying. Resultantly, the prices of food have skyrocketed. Moreover, the shortage of cooking gas triggered by Israel has also worsened living conditions.

Moreover, the emergence of militias, fragmentation of governance, and escalating violence suggest that the genocide is entering a phase of more destruction. Despite several calls by the United Nations to allow humanitarian aid into Gaza, the world is not paying heed to the innocent lives trying to survive each second there.

Continue Reading

Featured

The New Islamophobia: From Al-Quds Day Ban to America’s Anti-Muslim Surge

Published

on

The-New-Islamophobia-From-Al-Quds-Day-Ban-to-Americas-Anti-Muslim-Surge

The world has witnessed Islamophobia in different intensities, especially during the last two decades. However, in recent years, especially after the genocide in Gaza and the US-Israel versus Iran war, it has moved from the margins of public debate to the center of social and political discussions in Western societies. Recent research data shows hostilities toward Muslim communities have reached unusual levels, both in Europe and the United States.

Recently, two significant decisions brought this issue into sharper focus. One is the decision to restrict London’s annual Al-Quds Day march, and the second is the record surge in anti-Muslim complaints reported across the United States. Both of these events highlight a broader trend that is affecting Muslims globally.

The Al-Quds Day Debate in London

Since 1979, Al-Quds Day has been observed internationally to demonstrate solidarity with Palestinians. It also serves as a platform for discussing Middle Eastern political issues. Specifically in London, the annual march has taken place for decades, drawing activists, community organizations, and political groups.

However, this year, authorities moved to prevent the traditional procession, citing concerns over public safety and rising geopolitical tensions. Officials argued that large demonstrations related to the Middle East could create security challenges, particularly at a time when international conflicts were intensifying.

The decision immediately sparked debate across the United Kingdom. Supporters of the restrictions argued that authorities must prioritize public safety and prevent potential unrest. On the other hand, numerous people, including many civil liberties groups, questioned whether banning such demonstrations risked limiting legitimate political expression.

Regardless of the political positions surrounding the decision, the controversy reflects a larger question facing Western societies. How to balance public security concerns with the rights of communities to express political solidarity and participate in democratic debate.

Islamophobia in the United Kingdom

Stats from the United Kingdom show that anti-Muslim hostility remains one of the most significant forms of religious discrimination in the country.

According to credible estimates, roughly 4,500 Islamophobic incidents were recorded in a recent year, ranging from verbal abuse and online harassment to physical attacks and vandalism targeting mosques.

Official government crime statistics reveal a similar trend. Muslims make up around 5 percent of the population of England and Wales, yet they account for close to half of all victims of religious hate crimes recorded by police.

Many incidents involve everyday harassment in public spaces or online platforms. Others include damage to religious buildings or threatening messages directed at Muslim institutions.

Community leaders often point out that such incidents can have wider social consequences. Fear of harassment can discourage individuals from fully participating in public life, from attending religious services to engaging in civic activism.

A Record Surge of Complaints in the United States

On the other hand, similar concerns are emerging over the Atlantic. The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), which is the largest Muslim civil rights organization in the United States, reported 8,683 complaints of anti-Muslim discrimination or harassment in 2025. According to the organization, this represents the highest number of complaints recorded since it began collecting data in 1996.

These complaints cover a wide range of situations, including the following:

  • Workplace discrimination
  • Immigration-related harassment
  • Online threats and intimidation
  • Discrimination in education and housing

But such figures often represent only a portion of actual incidents, since many victims choose not to report harassment.

Researchers studying patterns of discrimination have found that spikes in anti-Muslim hostility frequently occur during periods of heightened geopolitical tension involving Muslim-majority regions. Moreover, political rhetoric, media narratives, and international crises can all shape how minority communities are perceived domestically.

Universities and the Politics of Protest

Many educational institutions, like universities, have increasingly become a focal point in debates over political expression related to the Middle East.

Student demonstrations, particularly those connected to the Gaza genocide, have appeared on campuses across Europe and North America. Several universities have responded by imposing restrictions on certain protest activities or relocating demonstrations to designated areas. In some cases, police have been called to disperse encampments or enforce campus rules.

These situations have sparked broader discussions about academic freedom and the role universities play as spaces for political debate.

Media Narratives and Public Perception

Another factor shaping the conversation around Islamophobia is the role of media representation. Academic studies examining media coverage in Western countries have found that Muslims are often disproportionately associated with security issues, extremism, or geopolitical conflict in news reporting. Ultimately, such framing can influence public perceptions and reinforce stereotypes.

At the same time, Muslim communities in Europe and North America are diverse, encompassing millions of citizens and residents engaged in every sector of society, from medicine and education to business, public service, and the arts.

Understanding this diversity is a crucial step in addressing misconceptions that sometimes contribute to social tensions.

Addressing the Challenge

“Every life is equal, and every human deserves respect.”

Governments and civil society organizations across Western countries have increasingly acknowledged the need to confront anti-Muslim discrimination.

When it comes to the United Kingdom, policymakers have discussed establishing clearer definitions of anti-Muslim hatred and improving the monitoring of hate crimes. On the other hand, in the United States, advocacy groups continue to push for stronger legal protections and better reporting mechanisms.

Moreover, educational initiatives, interfaith programs, and community partnerships should also be promoted for a peaceful community.

In a nutshell, ensuring democratic societies remain inclusive and respectful of religious diversity is the way forward for a peaceful and prosperous future.

Continue Reading

Featured

Gaza on the Brink Again: How the Rafah Border Closure Is Pushing 2 Million People Toward Extreme Hunger

Published

on

Source: Reuters

Although the world is more focused on the ongoing Israel-Iran War, a lot of severe genocidal acts are underway as a backdrop in Gaza. The 2.2 million people who are living in the Gaza Strip in abysmal conditions are just surviving, day after day.

Amidst the war, Israel again closed the Rafah border crossing after it was reopened just a month ago. It is undoubtedly a heinous attack on the innocent civilians of Gaza. Gaza’s only direct gateway to Egypt has once again pushed the enclave toward a severe humanitarian catastrophe.

Israel was allowing just a limited number of aid supplies into Gaza before the Rafah closure, but this genocidal act has completely stopped every humanitarian effort. As a result, the crisis of food shortages, medical collapse, and worsening hunger is getting extreme.

Rafah Crossing: Gaza’s Last Remaining Humanitarian Lifeline

The Rafah crossing has long been Gaza’s most critical humanitarian corridor. Unlike other crossings that are controlled by Israel, Rafah connects Gaza directly to Egypt and the wider Muslim world.

The Rafah crossing serves through:

  • Entry of humanitarian aid, including food, medicine, and fuel
  • Evacuation of wounded and critically ill patients
  • Entry of doctors, journalists, and international humanitarian workers

Gaza’s population is heavily dependent on imported supplies. The enclave produces less than 20% of the food it consumes, making border access essential for survival.

Before the latest closure, aid agencies estimated that 500 to 600 humanitarian aid trucks per day were needed to meet Gaza’s basic needs. In reality, only a fraction of that number has been able to enter.

Ultimately, when Rafah shuts down, Gaza’s already fragile humanitarian system quickly begins to collapse.

Gaza’s Growing Hunger Crisis

Food insecurity in Gaza has reached alarming levels.

The United Nations has warned that hundreds of thousands of people are now facing severe hunger, and food insecurity is reaching its highest levels. Humanitarian agencies report that many families have already reduced their daily meals to one per day or less.

Key indicators illustrating the scale of the crisis are as follows:

  • Over 80% of Gaza’s population relies on humanitarian food aid
  • Nearly a million Palestinians face catastrophic food insecurity
  • Food prices in local markets have surged dramatically due to shortages

Basic staples such as flour, rice, cooking oil, and sugar are becoming increasingly difficult to find. When supplies do appear in markets, prices are often far beyond what ordinary families can afford.

But now, as the aid is completely blocked, the survival of these families is uncertain.

Hospitals on the Edge of Collapse

Before the Rafah closure, critical patients were admitted to Egypt’s hospitals for better medical care. However, since its abrupt closure, medical officials warn that hospitals – a few remaining ones – across the territory are facing critical shortages of medicine, surgical equipment, and fuel needed to power generators.

Key health statistics revealing the severity of the situation are as follows:

  • More than half of Gaza’s hospitals are no longer operational.
  • Thousands of patients require urgent evacuation for treatment abroad.
  • Fuel shortages threaten intensive care units and dialysis centers.

Doctors report that shortages of antibiotics, anesthesia, and surgical materials are forcing hospitals to delay or cancel life-saving procedures.

Moreover, Electricity is another point of contention. Gaza’s power grid has been heavily damaged, meaning hospitals rely almost entirely on diesel generators. Without regular fuel deliveries, critical medical services could stop altogether.

The Role of the Regional Escalation

The latest humanitarian crisis in Gaza is unfolding against the backdrop of a wider regional confrontation involving Israel, the United States, and Iran.

Military tensions between these countries have intensified dramatically, raising fears of a broader Middle Eastern war. As security concerns rise, Israel has tightened its illegal control over Gaza’s borders, including restrictions affecting humanitarian aid routes.

In practice, these security measures primarily impact civilians living in Gaza, who are already struggling with displacement, economic collapse, and widespread destruction of infrastructure.

The result is that Palestinians in Gaza are once again paying the highest price for geopolitical conflicts that extend far beyond their territory.

The Genocide and Growing Global Criticism

The entire world is appalled by the scale of genocide and devastation in Gaza by Israel, with the unravelling support of the US.

The International Court of Justice, the United Nations, and other international organizations have declared it a genocide.

Critics argue that the widespread destruction of civilian infrastructure, mass displacement, and restrictions on food and aid amount to a form of collective punishment prohibited under international humanitarian law.

At the same time, many Western governments continue to provide Israel with political and military support, framing its actions as legitimate self-defense.

For many observers across the Muslim world and the Global South, this response highlights what they see as a profound double standard in the enforcement of international law.

A Population Pushed to the Edge

For Palestinians in Gaza, the closure of Rafah is not simply a political development, but an existential crisis.

Every closed crossing means no aid trucks, medical evacuations, and absolutely no opportunities for relief. Each restriction deepens the humanitarian emergency facing a population already enduring one of the most severe crises in modern history.

With Gaza’s borders sealed and humanitarian access restricted, the enclave’s two million residents remain trapped in a territory where survival increasingly depends on decisions made by distant political and military figures.

This is not so bothersome for the people living outside Palestine, but one must feel the pain that they are living through. How can we survive without food, water, and medical supplies for days and even years? How can we see our children, elders, and women die of hunger, thirst, and bombs? The world must take action before it’s too late!

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending