Connect with us

Featured

The 20-Point Gaza Plan: A Blueprint for Dispossession?

Published

on

The-20-Point-Gaza-Plan

As Gaza’s hospitals ran out of oxygen and children continued to die of hunger, a new “Peace Plan” emerged from Washington. The US President Donald Trump’s 20-Point Gaza Plan was announced recently in late September 2025. It has promised to rebuild Gaza and bring “a new era of stability.” However, to many Palestinians and observers across the world, it sounded like something else: a blueprint to erase what remains of Gaza’s sovereignty. What was initially discussed with the Arab states as a cooperative humanitarian initiative was, by the time of its release, cleverly reshaped. It is rewritten to preserve occupation under a new label.

From Arab Consensus to American Control

Early drafts of a postwar Gaza plan were reportedly framed through consultations among Arab and Muslim nations. They emphasized three principles: Palestinian self-rule, unrestricted humanitarian access, and reconstruction without foreign trusteeship. Yet as negotiations evolved, the plan was absorbed by U.S. diplomacy and redrafted in a way that aligned with Israeli conditions rather than Arab consensus. Several diplomats confirmed that Washington’s version quietly removed any reference to Palestinian sovereignty, replacing it with phrases like “transitional governance” and “security oversight.”

Even before it was officially unveiled, Reuters reported growing unease among Arab delegations, who complained that the new text ignored their agreed-upon points and reflected Israel’s security agenda. Pakistan’s foreign minister stated openly that “Trump’s 20-Point Gaza Plan is not our plan.” The shift marked more than a diplomatic re-edit as it exposed the power imbalance shaping Gaza’s future.

The 20 Points: Promises and Omissions

Publicly, Trump’s 20-Point Gaza Plan claims to rest on four pillars: ceasefire, hostage release, reconstruction, and demilitarization, yet its deeper clauses reveal troubling gaps. There is no guarantee of Palestinian sovereignty, no timeline for Israeli withdrawal, and no provision for international accountability. Instead, it envisions Gaza’s future under external trusteeship, with reconstruction funds controlled by a multinational board led by Washington and oversight committees dominated by Israel and allied states.

Several points speak of creating “safe redevelopment corridors” and “security zones,” terms human rights experts warn could mask forced relocations and demographic engineering. The plan further ties aid to behavior clauses, conditions governance on foreign approval, and places border control under “temporary supervision,” a phrase that critics fear means indefinite control. Amnesty International cautioned that “reconstruction must not become a pretext for displacement or collective punishment.”

In essence, while the plan’s language of peace and rebuilding appeals to diplomacy, its structure embeds dependency and control. To rebuild Gaza without granting it freedom is, as one Palestinian analyst put it, “to rebuild the prison walls, just higher and cleaner.”

The Human Cost Hidden Behind Diplomacy

Behind every clause of this plan lies a humanitarian catastrophe. The World Health Organization confirms that more than half a million people in Gaza face famine-level hunger, and over 360 have already died from malnutrition. The UN’s humanitarian office says 80% of Gaza’s population now depends on aid that Israel continues to restrict. In this reality, talk of “redevelopment corridors” rings hollow. Gaza does not need trusteeship—it needs food, medicine, and an end to the siege.

On the streets of Rafah and Deir al-Balah, survivors of months of bombardment heard the plan’s announcement with disbelief. “They speak of building new homes,” one displaced teacher told a reporter, “but they won’t even let cement cross the border.” Another woman asked, “Who gives them the right to plan our lives while we bury our dead?” These voices reveal the heart of Gaza’s objection: no document signed abroad can substitute for the will of its people.

Resistance and Rejection

Hamas’s initial response to the plan was mixed. The group welcomed references to reconstruction and aid delivery but rejected disarmament and external trusteeship. “No peace built on surrender will last,” its spokesman said. Across Palestinian civil society, activists dismissed the plan as “occupation repackaged.” Hashtags like #NoTrusteeship and #GazaIsNotForSale flooded social media, uniting Gazans and diaspora voices in digital defiance.

Former U.S. diplomat Robert Malley, writing for Le Monde, described the plan as “a maze of ambiguities and potential pitfalls.” His analysis noted that the proposal’s vagueness is deliberate—creating space for powerful states to interpret its clauses to their advantage. It is a familiar strategy: promise reconstruction while ensuring dependency.

Reactions among Arab and Muslim nations were cautious and divided. The Arab League issued a restrained statement calling for further review, while countries like Algeria, Iran, and Pakistan warned that any plan lacking Palestinian representation was unacceptable. Meanwhile, Western governments praised the proposal as a “bold step toward stability.” For Gazans, these words offered little comfort. They have seen such language before in the Oslo Accords, the Road Map, and countless other documents that delivered control, not liberation.

International law offers a clear measure. The plan’s idea of trusteeship contradicts the principle of self-determination guaranteed by the UN Charter and multiple General Assembly resolutions. Legal scholars argue that placing Gaza under external administration without consent would constitute a new form of occupation. The International Court of Justice’s 2024 advisory opinion warned that “peace agreements cannot validate the continuation of unlawful control.” Trump’s plan, critics say, does precisely that.

What True Peace Would Look Like

A genuine peace framework would begin not with political engineering but with justice. It would:

  • End the blockade entirely, allowing Gaza to trade and rebuild freely.
  • Place reconstruction under Palestinian-led management, not foreign trusteeship.
  • Hold accountable those responsible for war crimes and the starvation policy.
  • Guarantee the right of return and compensation for the displaced.
  • Empower Gaza’s people to elect their own representatives without external approval.

Anything less is not peace but an administrative occupation.

The Moral and Legal Test for the World

The 20-Point Plan is not a diplomatic breakthrough but a moral test. To accept it as written would mean endorsing a future where Gaza remains controlled by the same forces that destroyed it. It would normalize collective punishment under the banner of reform. And it would bury the core demand that Palestinians have made for decades: the right to decide their destiny.

Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and UN experts have all warned that Gaza’s crisis cannot be resolved through imposed governance. The path forward must restore dignity, not dependency. Yet, while the world debates corridors and committees, Gaza’s hospitals run without light, and its children die nameless in the dark.

The Bottom Line

Trump’s 20-Point Gaza Plan may speak the language of peace, but its structure carries the logic of control. For Gaza, peace cannot be built by those who silence its voice. True reconstruction will not come from Washington or Tel Aviv, but it will rise from the streets of Khan Yunis and the refugee camps that still believe in freedom.

The people of Gaza do not reject peace but subjugation disguised as diplomacy. Their message to the world remains clear: “We will rebuild, but on our own terms.” And until that right is honored, no plan, however polished, can claim the name of peace.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Featured

From Gaza’s Genocide to Lebanon’s Bombing: The Assault on the Muslim World Expands

Published

on

From-Gazas-Genocide-to-Lebanons-Bombing-The-Assault-on-the-Muslim-World-Expands

What began with joint US-Israeli strikes on Iran on Feb 28, 2026, quickly spread across the region, linking Gaza, Iran, and Lebanon into a single, expanding, and unwanted conflict.

This is a series of the most volatile events of contemporary times. While a temporary ceasefire with Iran has opened the door for talks, the reality on the ground tells a different story. Gaza remains under genocidal devastation, while Lebanon is under heavy bombardment.

Resultantly, regional tensions are at their highest in years. However, this is not something happening in isolation but a large-scale genocide being unfolded across multiple fronts.

Gaza: The Genocide That Never Stopped

Even as attention shifted toward Iran, Gaza never saw even a bit of relief. More than 2 million Palestinians remain trapped, with the majority displaced internally. Entire neighborhoods have been flattened, and basic services, like water, electricity, and healthcare, have vanished.

Despite diplomatic developments elsewhere, Israeli strikes in Gaza have continued, reinforcing a central reality. The genocide in Gaza did not pause; rather, it became the foundation for a wider assault.

So, Gaza is not separate from the current regional crisis. It is where it began and where it continues.

The Iran Strikes That Changed the Region

On February 28, 2026, U.S. and Israeli forces carried out coordinated and unprovoked airstrikes targeting Iran. These strikes marked a significant shift from indirect confrontation to direct engagement. Even a primary school for girls was hit by the Israeli and US-led airstrikes in Iran, resulting in the deaths of hundreds of innocent lives.

In response to Israel’s act of aggressionand the United States’ Operation Epic Fury, Iran launched Operation True Promise IV. It also launched ballistic missiles and drones to retaliate.

After putting the entire region into flames, Israel declared a state of emergency, while regional airspace disruptions and security alerts spread across neighboring countries.

This heavy exchange transformed the conflict. What had been contained within Gaza now extended into a broader regional confrontation involving a major state actor.

Lebanon: The Expansion No One Could Ignore

If Gaza was the starting point and Iran the escalation, Lebanon became the clearest sign of expansion. So, even after a ceasefire announcement by the US, Israeli airstrikes across Lebanon resulted in:

  • Over 250 to 300 people killed within 24 to 48 hours
  • More than 1,000 injured
  • Dozens of strikes hit densely populated urban areas, including Beirut

These were among the deadliest attacks on Lebanon in decades. Crucially, these strikes continued despite the ceasefire framework announcement with Iran. Israeli leadership made it clear that they are not going to halt their heinous operations in Lebanon despite the long-awaited peace talks.

A Ceasefire That Did Not Bring Calm

The ceasefire announcement between the United States and Iran was presented as a step toward de-escalation. It opened the door for talks in Islamabad, raising hopes of stabilizing the situation.

However, events on the ground contradicted those expectations. Some of these events include:

  • Lebanon continued to face severe and unprovoked bombardment
  • Gaza remained under genocidal attacks
  • Regional military readiness stayed elevated

This created a fragile and uncertain environment in which diplomacy and escalation coexisted. A temporary ceasefire on paper did not translate into peace across the region.

The Strait of Hormuz: A Global Risk Point

Beyond the immediate Middle Eastern battle zones, the conflict has placed critical global infrastructure at risk.

The Strait of Hormuz, through which nearly 20% of the world’s oil supply passes, has become a central pressure point. Iran has signaled its ability to restrict or disrupt traffic through the strait if escalation continues.

This is to pressurize the US and Israel to think about what they are doing at least twice. So, even the possibility of disruption has:

  • Increased volatility in global oil markets
  • Triggered economic concerns far beyond the Middle East

This underscores a key reality that the conflict is not confined to borders, but its consequences are global.

A Connected Battlefield and The Muslim World

What is happening across Gaza, Iran, and Lebanon is not coincidental but a reflection of a wider ideology. This ideology has roots in Islamophobia, too, but the primary driver here is Israel, supported by the United States.

Each front reflects a different dimension of the same conflict:

  • Gaza: Genocide, humanitarian devastation, and mass displacement
  • Iran: Unprovoked and Imposed War
  • Lebanon: Expansion of active military operations by Israel

Although some countries are trying to help de-escalate the situation, such as Turkiye, Qatar, Pakistan, and Egypt, most have complex responses.

Especially the US military bases in Gulf countries such as Saudi Arabia, Oman, Bahrain, and Qatar are being attacked by Iran as a counter-strike.

Rather than observing these events in isolation, using a broader lens makes everything clear.

The future scenario could be a temporary stabilization as Iran brought their 10 points, while the U.S. brought 15 points for the ceasefire to be agreed.

While the efforts to make peace are underway, Israel is still involved in one of the deadliest assaults on Lebanon. The Muslim World should unite at this difficult time, not only for regional stability but also for global peace and prosperity.

Continue Reading

Featured

How Gaza Is Losing the People It Needs to Survive

Published

on

How-Gaza-Is-Losing-the-People-It-Needs-to-Survive

Gaza’s genocide is often described and portrayed through images of collapsed buildings and rising death tolls. But a deeper loss is silently unfolding amidst the genocide – one that cannot be rebuilt with cement or aid.

Gaza is losing its people – not only through death, but also through forced displacement, unemployment, blocked movement, and the collapse of education, as well as professional life.

Recent figures show how severe this shift has become. Gaza’s unemployment rate has surged to around 80%. Moreover, the overall economy of the Strip has shrunk by nearly 87%, reducing total output to just $362 million. When it comes to the GDP per capita, it has fallen to about $161, wiping out over two decades of development.

Even the people in Gaza are surviving from day to day just to live. At the same time, nearly 70% of Gaza’s population is under the age of 30. So, it is evident that the crisis is not abstract, but all of this is happening to the generation that should be carrying Gaza forward.

From Graduates to Survival

Before the genocide, young Palestinians invested heavily in education. Degrees in engineering, medicine, and business were seen as the only path out of hardship.

However, today, that pathway has completely collapsed. In this context, the story of Mahmoud Shamiya is documented as an example, a university graduate who now spends his days collecting firewood and fetching water in a displacement camp. His words capture the shift clearly: young people have become “aimless, jobless, and hopeless.

So, this is not a temporary setback, but an act of structural genocide. When an economy collapses and movement is extremely restricted, education loses its purpose. Degrees no longer lead to jobs, skills cannot be used, and ambition is replaced by survival.

Education Has Been Torn Apart

The damage to Gaza’s education system is systemic. According to recent credible assessments:

  • Around 658,000 to 660,000 students have lost access to regular education
  • Between 87% and 97% of school buildings have been completely obliterated
  • Immediate damage to the education sector is estimated at $870 million, rising to $3.8 billion over five years

So, in this extremely volatile situation, education has become impossible. Even emergency education funding has faded out. Out of nearly $198 million required, only about 3.3% is estimated to be secured.

This is a complete deliberate collapse of the education sector of Palestinians by Israel.  Students are not simply missing classes — they are losing entire academic years, and in fact, losing most precious years of their lives.

Rafah Is Controlling Who Gets a Future

Yet, for many young Palestinians, the only remaining path forward lies outside Gaza. This is only possible through scholarships, medical placements, or training opportunities abroad.

But that path runs through Rafah, and it is not open. There are hundreds of cases of capable students waiting for the only border to get reopened. For instance, there is a case of Mona Al-Mashharawi. She is a student who secured admission in a university in Algeria, but due to Israel’s restrictions and Rafah closure, she has been trapped for three years. She was meant to leave in November 2023.

There is a complete timeline of the Rafah border:

  • Rafah crossing was seized by Israel in May 2024
  • It reopened only partially in 2026, allowing a limited number of people on foot, just for health emergency cases
  • Movement remains extremely restricted, unpredictable, and insufficient for normal life

Who will be responsible for these innocent dreams and the futures of thousands of young people? Who can bring their most precious years back? It’s part of a broader genocide strategy of Israel to eliminate all the footprints of the Palestinian generations.

The Private Sector Has Been Crushed

Before the genocide, Gaza’s private sector accounted for around 52% of employment. It provided livelihoods through small businesses, services, and local industries.

However, today, that system has completely collapsed. Estimates indicate some harsh realities:

  • Up to 90% of economic sectors have been wiped out
  • Total economic losses are approaching $70 billion

The Loss of Skilled Professionals

The most critical loss is not visible in rubble, but it is the loss of people who make recovery possible.

It is evident that doctors cannot work without hospitals. Engineers cannot build without infrastructure, and teachers cannot teach without schools.

Reports now confirm the displacement of skilled workers during the genocide, adding another layer to the crisis. Those who left took with them education, experience, and institutional knowledge.

Those who remain often cannot function in their professions, and as a result, there is a vacuum.

Even if somehow rebuilding begins tomorrow, the people needed to lead that process are either gone, displaced, or unable to work psychologically or physically.

A Generation Forced Into Survival Mode

Gaza’s youth should have been its greatest strength, but now, they are the most affected group of the heinous genocide.

With absolutely no jobs, no stable education, restricted movement, and destroyed infrastructure, young people are no longer planning futures. They are managing survival day after day.

The long-term effects are clear:

  • Delayed or lost careers
  • Reduced economic recovery
  • Severe psychological trauma
  • Weakened social systems

When an entire generation is pushed into survival mode, the damage does not end with the genocide.

As of now, more than 80% to 90% of Gaza’s population depends entirely on humanitarian aid. The aid is itself extremely restricted, and resultantly making survival extremely challenging.

Even the water supply has been reduced to just around 10% of the overall daily requirement in Gaza.

After all this, one fact is certain: the capacity and the future of Gaza are being eroded in an unprecedented way by Israel and its allies. Unless the world realizes the quest for survival in Gaza, nothing is going to change!

Continue Reading

Featured

How Gaza’s Reproductive Life Was Systematically Destroyed

Published

on

How-Gazas-Reproductive-Life-Was-Systematically-Destroyed

A traditional frontline in modern warfare is typically a trench or a high military hotspot, but in Gaza, the concept of the frontline has moved towards unimaginable realities. The devastation in Gaza has been widely measured in destroyed homes, shattered hospitals, and tens of thousands of lives lost.

However, there is another dimension in the Gaza genocide that is being unfolded quietly. It is a strike at the very foundation of a people’s future. Israel is systematically moving the frontline of this genocide towards delivery rooms and neonatal wards.

All across Gaza, the conditions required for pregnancy, childbirth, and infant survival have been systematically dismantled. From the complete destruction of fertility clinics to the collapse of maternity care, the impact is no longer limited to the present. It ultimately extends directly into the future.

The Fertility Clinic That Lost Thousands of Embryos

One of the most striking examples of this collapse came with the destruction of Gaza’s largest fertility center. The Al Basma IVF Centre, a facility that offered hope to families struggling with infertility, was badly hit during the genocide. According to credible reports, around 4,000 embryos stored at the clinic were destroyed.

Each embryo represented a future — a family waiting, a life planned, a possibility that no longer exists. The loss of the clinic meant more than the destruction of a building. It erased years of medical effort and removed one of the few pathways to parenthood for many couples in Gaza.

Israel deliberately targeted the maternal health infrastructure of Gaza, making it an unprecedented act in world history. The brutality and hate during the genocide are already evident, as hundreds of thousands of people were martyred.

Births Falling at an Unprecedented Rate

The impact of genocide on reproduction is now visible in Gaza’s birth statistics. Data shows that births in Gaza dropped by 41% in the first half of 2025 compared with 2022.

However, normal demographic shifts do not explain such a sharp decline. It reflects a reality where:

  • Families are displaced repeatedly
  • Healthcare services are severely limited
  • Food shortages and stress affect pregnancy
  • Safety itself is uncertain

When births fall at this scale, it signals more than disruption. It indicates that the conditions necessary for sustaining life are no longer intact.

Pregnancy Under Conditions of Survival

For thousands of women in Gaza, pregnancy has become a daily struggle for survival. Estimates indicate that more than 150,000 pregnant and breastfeeding women have been living under conditions of displacement, food insecurity, and limited medical care. Moreover, many of them lack access to basic prenatal services.

Reports from human rights organisations describe:

  • Malnutrition during pregnancy
  • Lack of clean water
  • Extremely limited access to doctors and medicine

These effects are not secondary but primary as they directly influence maternal health, fetal development, and survival outcomes.

Investigations by Human Rights Watch documented numerous scenes where multiple newborns were forced to share a single incubator. There is an entire strategy of sterilization rooted in colonial history.

Colonizers used forced sterilization as a strategy against the innocent wombs. The Genocide Convention of 1948 explicitly defines measures to stop the birthrate as an act of genocide.

Childbirth Amidst the Genocide

The collapse of Gaza’s healthcare system has transformed childbirth itself. Al-Shifa Hospital and others that once handled routine deliveries are now operating under extreme pressure, or have been damaged or destroyed. Supplies are scarce, electricity is unreliable, and medical staff are overwhelmed.

This is a stark indicator of how far conditions have deteriorated. Childbirth, which requires stability, hygiene, and skilled care, is now taking place in environments where none of those can be found at all.

A Systematic Genocide of a Generation

Numerous international humanitarian organizations, such as Amnesty International, stated that women in Gaza are being denied the basic conditions necessary for life, including reproductive health services.

The continuity of an entire generation of Palestinians is at stake due to these heinous genocidal acts. Reproductive health is not only a medical issue, but it is deeply tied to population stability, family structure, and long-term social continuity.

The destruction of reproductive systems, whether through infrastructure, access, or conditions, has lasting consequences. The intentions of Israel and its allies, including the United States, are absolutely visible. They want to wipe out the word “Palestine” from the face of the earth through every single effort.

Despite the scale of this devastation, the horror remains largely underreported by the Western Media. This silence is actually like taking part in the genocide.

In a nutshell, the ability to sustain life has been severely compromised. Israel has ultimately turned the womb into a battlefield. Specifically in Gaza, the consequences of genocide are no longer confined to the present. They largely extend into the possibility of life itself!

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending